An associate left our firm today so all the personnel he sponsored were removed. Each of these 80+ people received a confirmation of removal. I can appreciate the reason for sending the notification is to allow personnel working with each other to confirm erroneous removals, however, personnel in large firms such as ours expect there to be a reason for changes such as these and need not receive these types of emails. ...more »
The ability to log in to Private PAIR and EFS-Web using a PKI was unavailable on May 30 and 31. On May 31 the USPTO.gov login suddenly failed. Yes, filings can be made through other means such as the EFS-Web contingency system, fax (not applications), mail, and hand delivery (for those with direct PTO access). What cannot be done is any other function that the USPTO.gov account provides access to such as sponsorship ...more »
Discovered that requesting a certified copy through Private PAIR avoids the need for an entitlement document. Yay! It would be great to have that information included on the home page for the Certified Copy Center. For example, after explaining Proof of entitlement you could have two bullets. One for Private PAIR indicating that private access results in acceptance of entitlement; and two for all other requests where ...more »
It would be nice to have the ePetition for Withdrawal as Attorney to mirror PTO/AIA/83 by only taking correspondence address information if it needs to be changed to the applicant/inventor. Form 83 doesn't require the practitioner to enter new correspondence information unless there needs to be a change to what is already present.
Two-step authentication was not always required in the past for logging into MyUSPTO. With the issue of not being able to retrieve code emails today, it seems smart for the Office to eliminate any requirement for two-step authentication at the MyUSPTO login stage. Instead, require the two-step authentication when the user attempts to access a secure system for the first time. For example, the first time someone clicks ...more »
Patent assigned creating conflict with Human Interfacing Device heterogeneous Access System combined with Intelligent Information Autonomics verified Omni-all infra systems tailored, parental guardianship and rights to ownership are eminent claimed by I, Christopher M. Spradling. Major maliciousness with non compliance of open source attachments and properties set forth with non dispensary agreements and procurements ...more »
I have noticed that often the only acknowledgement by the USPTO that a pre-exam formalities response is satisfactory is a new filing receipt. I think it would be helpful if the USPTO would issue a response stating clearly that the particular formality has been satisfied.
For a long time, EFS eFiling receipts left the "Deposit Account" and "Authorized User" fields blank, even when fees were paid by Deposit Account. This was fixed at some point in the last few years, but seems to have broken again. Please fix this.
When submitting an updated Application Data Sheet to update the applicant using EProcessing, the Power of Attorney document is not available as an EProcessing selectable document. If I want to submit a Power of Attorney executed by the new applicant, I must do so as a separate EFS submission.
Users of the new Certified Copy Center ("Center") must sign in at the Center's page rather than access through their MyUSPTO page. Although already signed in through MyUSPTO, users will need to sign in again when accessing the Center's page.
A link to the Center should be available under both the Patents and Trademarks drop-down menus.
Kudos for converting the system for ordering certified copies. There is a major flaw in the system when you require users to log in using their USPTO.gov account. The flaw is that the system requires one or more entitlement documents before a user can proceed. This is a flaw because practitioners associated with customer numbers have access to unpublished applications, and the staff the sponsor do as well. Why require ...more »
The WebADS form currently does NOT fill in the date field in the signature block, which is a huge problem: if an ADS is not properly signed, which signature includes the date, it is treated as a transmittal letter and not a proper ADS. Critically, this means that any priority claims are not (or may not be) considered. Applicants should NOT be penalized for using the PTO's own systems, especially when much of the appeal ...more »
Removing sponsored staff when they leave a firm is an urgent task and cannot always wait for practitioners to have time to complete the process. Alleviate this burden by including in the Sponsorship Tool a feature to allow for assigning different levels of security like in Financial Manager. A practitioner would designate one or more sponsored staff as administrators to manage sponsorship changes from the staff's own ...more »
In addition to the list of sponsored personnel is not in alphabetical order by default, users must scroll to see the available options for viewing more than 10 sponsored personnel per page. Options to show up to # are not visible when a user clicks on the "10 per page" link. Instead, users have to scroll to see the options for 10 items, 25 items, 50 items, and 100 items. In addition to automatically scrolling the page ...more »
Add a feature to the Sponsorship Tool to allow a user to export the list of staff that have been sponsored by the practitioner. When a large number of practitioners sponsor the same staff, having a list to confirm is greatly beneficial to ensuring that staff no longer associated with the practitioner no longer have access under that practitioner.